Monday, July 20th, 2009
Two of our biggest bugbears are sponsored conversation and lack of transparency in online word of mouth. So it’s good to see social media ethics hitting the news as New York’s Attorney General Andrew Cuomo orders plastic surgery franchise Lifestyle Lift to pay $300,000 penalties and costs for astroturfing – publishing fake positive consumer reviews across the web – as well as intervening in and trying to ban other negative WOM. Hair(line) raising indeed.
This comes on the back of news that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has proposed new guidelines on social media disclosure:
“brands and bloggers both may be held liable should either the FTC or scorned consumers deem that their actions or claims misguided them, or misrepresented the actual performance or efficacy of the product or service in question… the ability for a consumer to exercise better judgment and common sense is indefensible when a glaring absence of disclosure is pervasive”
Brian Solis’s TechCrunch post gives an excellent overview of the state of play so far and chimes with our own belief in the pointlessness and damage of sponsored conversation – although some brands are still trying to leverage paid WOM into every platform possible, such as TNT’s sponsored tweets. It’s also worth keeping an eye on Jeremiah Owyang’s running list of sponsored conversations in social media, a roundup of brands whose ethical policy evidently goes something along the lines of ‘Independence? Emotional engagement? Mutual respect? Meh.’