1000 Heads

Helping brands’ stories travel further and faster
  • Twitter
  • Flickr
  • vimeo
  • foursquare
  • linked

How not to approach a WOM campaign

Tom Messett

29 March, 2010

A new member of the ‘Heads team speaks! We’d like to introduce you to Tom, recently appointed Community Exec and all round good (easter) egg, who has a provocative post to share…

Hi all – I’m Tom and the newest member of the 1000heads team. I join from 6Consulting where I worked to provide the Radian6 social media monitoring solution to Marketing, PR and Customer Service teams at corporate clients across the UK.

In the process of finding my new role I met with a number of agencies from across the spectrum of social media, marketing and PR.

To be honest, in that time I’ve encountered some problems with the way a lot of agencies (from across all disciplines) approach social media campaigns for clients. Most of these problems are born from the way agencies pitch for business and from not putting insight and understanding at the heart of their business. Without wanting to go on a rant, I think it’s really important to show some of the common approaches out there that are giving WOM a bad name.

This seems to be a pretty typical scenario for brands wanting to ‘get social’:

  1. Brand has some money left in the 1/4 budget (maybe £10k)
  2. Brand marketing team decides “well, social media is something I hear about a lot at the moment, so let’s do something with that”
  3. Agency called in to give some ideas of “what social media we can do for £10k”
  4. Agency account team is not that clued up and their soc med guy is overstretched, however they have some pretty creds and a basic idea of what is possible from some conference they went to 9 months ago. They also talk a lot about how Dell made all that money on Twitter!
  5. Agency account guys all want the fee, so they take down client requirements, tell the client they have done this stuff before and it’s all very possible, and then get the project signed off ASAP (so they get their fee)
  6. Account team celebrates, then they get back to the office and realise “uh-oh, we actually have to deliver this stuff”
  7. Agency hurriedly starts looking at how they are going to deliver the work, they suddenly realise that the tools cost more than they thought and the resource required is a lot higher and a lot more expensive.
  8. Because the team doesn’t really understand the space they cannot find all these promised “advocates” and “communities” they have told the client they are going to map and engage with, they just keep finding Splogs and spammy tweets – maybe they should have done some research before closing the sale!?
  9. They don’t know how to measure success even if they have it!
  10. The client is underwhelmed by the delivery and so decides to abandon the social media initiative as it seems like a waste of money.

The above is a ten-step recipe for failure and for waste; it is also unsustainable for both the agency and the client.

I chose to join 1000heads because it is so obvious how differently they do things here. 1000heads place insight at the heart of everything they do. They don’t just listen to the conversation before engaging, they truly understand how word of mouth works, what commitments are required (both online and offline) and what media and tools are best used to engage different audiences.

That comes from experience but also from robust research which leads to real, actionable insight that feeds into everything else and that ultimately feeds into successful campaigns, happy clients, and happy employees.

I’m proud to be one of them and looking forward to working on our account with Nokia. Come and say hi if you’re ever near Great Windmill Street.

Tags: , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on and is filed under 1000thoughts . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
  • http://www.tomsideas.wordpress.com/ Thomas Messett

    Thanks Scott, I am enjoying it so far :-)

  • Jo Porritt

    Hey Tom

    Happy to follow you to 1000Heads from 6Consulting as I loved what you had to say/share there, and still do now – they are lucky to have you!

    The above made me laugh – because I’ve seen that one before too, but it is a typical agency reaction to anything outside of their remit that they are still happy to hold their hand up for and go “Yep – we can do that!” Watched it when traditional agencies started to move into digital arenas and still watching it today with SM..

    The big difference this time is that anyone proclaiming how to utilise SM then not delivering the goods will be seen – you can’t bury the results in some campaign – this is real world stuff. It sorts the real boys (like 1000Heads) from the players (no names mentioned)

    Always happy to endorse your work, and I will most definitely be coming to see you all next time I get off the rock and visit London Town :)

  • http://scottgould.me/ Scott Gould

    Hi Tom

    Enjoy 1000heads. Great place to work.

    Scott

  • http://twitter.com/louisyunghoi Louis Yung-Hoi

    I totally agree with the points Tom has made. I've occasionally encountered brands (and agencies) who are vehemently dedicated to using a specific social media tool solely due to the buzz surrounding a service regardless of whether of not it is suited to achieving their campaign objectives.

    It often seems as though some brands are happy to be solely seen using social media without effectively integrating it into any meaningful strategic objectives.

    There definitely needs to be more awareness around the reasons why a WOM campaign might fall apart (as well as the benefits it can bring) as I believe it will instigate conversations at the inception of strategic development about why a brand may use social media and what it is that you are trying to extract from that community.

    Great post!

  • mollyflatt

    Agree with Louis – without getting too negative, highlighting where campaigns fall down can help brands learn from their mistakes, not throw the WOM baby out with the bathwater.

    It's so important that companies start to recognise the warning signs when something's being offered to them that doesn't sound like it has integrity or common sense. If it sounds a bit smoke and mirrors, it probably is.

    Great post Tom.

  • Louis Yung-Hoi

    Thanks Molly! By the way Tom, were you involved in the Nokia N96 Bruce Lee campaign? That ad was incredible!

  • http://www.digitallunch.blogspot.com/ Digital Lunch

    Good point, Tom, especially on the measuring issue: nobody can't guarantee beforehand the level of public interaction and the crowd sentiment, whereas if there's a deep understanding of SM/WOM usage, acquired through research and constant delivery – the campaign is more likely to meet its objectives! Well-done 1000heads! Best of luck!!

  • thomasmessett

    Hi Scott, yes it is a great place to work and I am enjoying it so far :-) thanks for the comment.

  • thomasmessett

    Hi Louis, yes that was a great ad, sadly I, personally, was not involved!

  • thomasmessett

    Thanks Jo, good to hear you like my work and I look forward to meeting you next time you get off the rock!! – I believe I owe you some kind of cake – and probably another one now for writing such an endorsement! :-)